|
|
Post by DoctorThrills on Mar 19, 2009 22:08:01 GMT -5
For Donna to address the finalists.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donna on Mar 20, 2009 21:59:38 GMT -5
Congrats Nathan, Warren and a special Congrats to my friend and ally Anthony!!!!
Anthony I am so happy to see you make the Final 3! Kudos and I hope you win!
Nathan and Warren, you turned out to not be as good of friends as I thought we were at the beginning of the game. But you all made the Final 3, so you played a good game.
My questionz to you all are:
1. Tell me all the people you were aligned with and how far you were willing to take them.
2. Tell me why I should vote for you and why I should not vote for the other 2 finalists.
3. Tell me how you think each juror will vote and why you think they will vote that way.
Thanks and Good Luck to all 3 of you!
Thanks Thrills! You are an awesome host and your challenges were very challenging!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Anthony on Mar 21, 2009 10:52:43 GMT -5
1. Tell me all the people you were aligned with and how far you were willing to take them.
I was allinged with Sheree, Donna, Kathleen and Sort of Tom during this game.
I wanted the Final 5 to consist of us 5, but I knew that would probably not happen because not all 5 of us were tight knit. I wanted to get everyone far because I trusted them the most.
Sheree - We made a Final 2 deal really early in this game and she is who I wanted to be my final 2 partner.
Donna- I wanted you at least Final 3 and it would have been hard to take you to final 2 if sheree was there but it didnt work out and when you and sheree were on the block together there was nothing I could do to save you and you left.
Kathleen - I was going to get Kathleen as far as I could but she wasnt someone I was going to keep around to teh finals. I was hoping to get Final 4 with her.
Tom- We never had a true alliance but at Final 4 I wanted him to go to finals with me since sheree was evicted.
2. Tell me why I should vote for you and why I should not vote for the other 2 finalists.
I think that I played a solid game. I won challenges, I made the right alliances and I was nice to the people around me. I think I was in a good spot and stayed in one this entire game.
I think that the other 2 finalists should not win because they lied to a lot of people. I think thay they didnt have solid alliances because it seemed that they booted the people who trusted them. I think that I played the better game out of the 3 of us.
3. Tell me how you think each juror will vote and why you think they will vote that way.
Well I think that Kathleen, Sheree and Donna will vote for me. I think this because I feel as if we were closer and got to know each other better.
Scott and Liz- Warren most likely. Scott threw his game away for warren, liz just because she doesnt like me and she was closer to warren.
Eric and Tom- Im not sure where there votes will go. I am hoping me but i think they are up in the air.
|
|
nathan
Junior Member
Posts: 78
|
Post by nathan on Mar 21, 2009 12:44:59 GMT -5
Congrats Nathan, Warren and a special Congrats to my friend and ally Anthony!!!! Anthony I am so happy to see you make the Final 3! Kudos and I hope you win! Nathan and Warren, you turned out to not be as good of friends as I thought we were at the beginning of the game. But you all made the Final 3, so you played a good game. My questionz to you all are: 1. Tell me all the people you were aligned with and how far you were willing to take them. 2. Tell me why I should vote for you and why I should not vote for the other 2 finalists. 3. Tell me how you think each juror will vote and why you think they will vote that way. Thanks and Good Luck to all 3 of you! Thanks Thrills! You are an awesome host and your challenges were very challenging!!! Hi Donna! 1. I actually didn't make a whole bunch of alliances. I figured out pretty early on that I was not well liked, and that I would have to just win challenges in order to get to the end. I made deals here and there, but the only person I ever completely alligned with is Warren. 2. I think if you want the winner to be the person who played the best game and worked the hardest, you should vote for me. 3. Honestly, I will fall over with shock if I get even one vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 21, 2009 14:16:22 GMT -5
Anthony-- I don't dislike you...I like you fine, but it just seems to me that you always target me in games.
|
|
|
|
Post by Warren on Mar 21, 2009 15:28:10 GMT -5
Nathan and Warren, you turned out to not be as good of friends as I thought we were at the beginning of the game. But you all made the Final 3, so you played a good game. My questionz to you all are: 1. Tell me all the people you were aligned with and how far you were willing to take them. 2. Tell me why I should vote for you and why I should not vote for the other 2 finalists. 3. Tell me how you think each juror will vote and why you think they will vote that way. Donna, I first want to comment on the friend statement you made. That statement seems to come out of left field for me because we never had an alliance of any sorts and also because I made numerous attempts to get to you know and build a relationship with you, but you were non-responsive. I asked you about your life, your career, what you do in your free time, etc, but it was always me asking the questions. Do you even know anything about me besides what was posted on the forum? When I didn’t make the effort to ask you about your life our conversations ended right after I said I was good, it was all surface level talk from you. So to call me a ‘not so good’ friend when I was there and I made attempts to talk to you and build a relationship is inaccurate. The fracture was on your end, not mine. The people I was aligned with in this gamer were: Nathan- we talked about everything and new we were out numbered and if we wanted to come close to the finals we had to steam roll through the competition. We had both the brawns and the brains to get to the end when there was a five-person alliance set up against two people. I truly think we were the underdogs of this game. Tom- was my second hand man in this game. I really enjoyed talking to him. I planned to go to the finals with him if Nathan got evicted, but he was final three in my plans. I made a final two alliance with him to ensure he didn’t go with the majority alliance. Scott- I never really discussed how far I wanted to go with Scott to Scott, but he was in my final four. He was a loyal and trustworthy guy and that is what I wanted in an alliance partner. I was upset he left when he did because I still wanted to keep him around. Liz and I had a very superficial relationship. I kind of strayed away from her when I realized she was so close with Kathleen and Kathleen was not with me. I didn't want her to leave when she did, but I was out numbered. Eric and I also had a very superficial alliance. I got tired of his nonchalant attitude and thought it would be best to let him go sooner than later. I think you should vote for me because I was the best well-rounded player. I won a lot of competitions. I was one of the more social players in the game. And finally I was very active and was always around. I was an opinionated player and a threat. You should not vote for Anthony because I don’t think he was as dedicated as much as Nathan and I. He didn’t win as many competitions. His social game was not on the same level, he rarely spoke. I had a tally and his favorite/most common responses were “hey, good, you.” I think Anthony got to the end by luck and by aligning with Sheree. I honestly feel that Nathan and I beat him in all aspects of the game. Honestly, Donna the only vote I can predict would be yours and that would be for Anthony. I think you are basing your vote on friendship rather than who played the best game. I would like to hope the rest of the votes are up for grabs and the rest of the jury will be voting on the best player rather their bff Anthony. |
|
|
|
Post by Anthony on Mar 21, 2009 15:51:15 GMT -5
Anthony-- I don't dislike you...I like you fine, but it just seems to me that you always target me in games. Well Im glad that you dont hate me lol. I targetted you here cause you were a threat, we can talk about it on AIM if you want to go into a full discussion  |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 21, 2009 22:11:06 GMT -5
^ Yes, we should do that, lol. I've never understood how I'm a threat in games  |
|
|
|
Post by yang on Mar 22, 2009 7:34:55 GMT -5
^ Yes, we should do that, lol. I've never understood how I'm a threat in games Pawns frequently gravitate towards you giving you a small army of your own... |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 22, 2009 7:45:19 GMT -5
Wow, acknowledgment by Yang. I'm flattered.
|
|
|
|
Post by yang on Mar 23, 2009 12:40:13 GMT -5
Wow, acknowledgment by Yang. I'm flattered. You should be, it's the only time in your life someone will pay attention to you *grins* |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 23, 2009 17:17:41 GMT -5
Wow, acknowledgment by Yang. I'm flattered. You should be, it's the only time in your life someone will pay attention to you *grins* Pawns frequently gravitate towards you giving you a small army of your own... Getting a little self-contradictory here, Yang? |
|
|
|
Post by sheree on Mar 24, 2009 21:37:03 GMT -5
lol, yes Yang is good for that!! lol
|
|
